McMonnies Questionnaire: Enhancing screening for Dry Eye Syndromes using Rasch Analysis.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Nov 5.
Gothwal VK, Pesudovs K, Wright T, McMonnies C.
NH&MRC Centre for Clinical Eye Research, Department of Ophthalmology, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Nov 5.
Gothwal VK, Pesudovs K, Wright T, McMonnies C.
NH&MRC Centre for Clinical Eye Research, Department of Ophthalmology, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
PURPOSE: To determine, using Rasch analysis, if the McMonnies questionnaire satisfied the properties of a measure and whether screening for dry eye syndromes (DES) could be enhanced using different scoring approaches.
METHODS: The questionnaire was self-administered by 43 female Sjögren syndrome patients (>45 years) recruited from a specialized rheumatology clinic and 140 age-matched controls. Data were scaled using Rasch analysis and assessed for response category behavior and ability to reliably discriminate between severity of participant's dry eye symptoms (i.e. person separation reliability; minimum acceptable value 0.80). Standard summary statistics of screening performance were calculated for raw and Rasch-scaled scores from Receiver-Operating Characteristic analysis including area under the curve (AUC). Best predictors (i.e. questions) from a discriminant analysis were used to calculate a discriminant function for both Rasch-scaled and raw scores.
RESULTS: Response categories were not used as intended, necessitating collapse of categories. Person separation reliability was inadequate (0.75). Rasch-scaled discriminant cut-off score of -2.29 logits from 7 items provided an AUC of 0.99 with 95% sensitivity. However, discriminant raw score from modification in the scoring of a question, i.e. use of medications (used singly rather than individual questions) provided AUC (0.97) not significantly different (z = 1.11, p = 0.27) with 98% sensitivity and required only 2 questions.
CONCLUSIONS: In this population, the McMonnies questionnaire does not function as a measure. However, various scoring methods can be used to efficiently screen for DES.